Evolution of dust content in galaxies probed by gamma-ray burst afterglows

TL;DR

This study uses gamma-ray burst afterglow data to explore the evolution of dust content in galaxies, revealing discrepancies between observed dust-to-gas ratios and theoretical models, and suggesting dense, low-efficiency star-forming environments are key.

Contribution

It provides new insights into dust evolution in high-redshift galaxies by combining observational data with dust formation models, highlighting the need for dense, low-efficiency star-forming regions.

Findings

Observed dust-to-gas ratios are higher than theoretical predictions.

Efficient dust growth in dense clouds requires very low star formation efficiencies.

Dense environments with low star formation efficiency can explain high dust content at low metallicities.

Abstract

Because of their brightness, gamma-ray burst (GRB) afterglows are viable targets for investigating the dust content in their host galaxies. Simple intrinsic spectral shapes of GRB afterglows allow us to derive the dust extinction. Recently, the extinction data of GRB afterglows are compiled up to redshift $z=6.3$, in combination with hydrogen column densities and metallicities. This data set enables us to investigate the relation between dust-to-gas ratio and metallicity out to high redshift for a wide metallicity range. By applying our evolution models of dust content in galaxies, we find that the dust-to-gas ratio derived from GRB afterglow extinction data are excessively high such that they can be explained with a fraction of gas-phase metals condensed into dust ($f_\mathrm{in}$) $\sim 1$, while theoretical calculations on dust formation in the wind of asymptotic giant branch stars and in the ejecta of Type II supernovae suggest a much more moderate condensation efficiency ($f_\mathrm{in}\sim 0.1$). Efficient dust growth in dense clouds has difficulty in explaining the excessive dust-to-gas ratio at metallicities $Z/\mathrm{Z}_\odot <\epsilon$, where $\epsilon$ is the star formation efficiency of the dense clouds. However, if $\epsilon$ is as small as 0.01, the dust-to-gas ratio at $Z\sim 10^{-2}$ Z$_\odot$ can be explained with $n_\mathrm{H}\gtrsim 10^6$ cm$^{-3}$. Therefore, a dense environment hosting dust growth is required to explain the large fraction of metals condensed into dust, but such clouds should have low star formation efficiencies to avoid rapid metal enrichment by stars.