Pickands' constant $H_{\alpha}$ does not equal $1/\Gamma(1/\alpha)$, for small $\alpha$
Adam J. Harper

TL;DR
This paper disproves the conjecture that Pickands' constant equals 1/Γ(1/α) for all small α, providing new lower bounds and refining existing methods with Brownian motion calculations.
Contribution
It proves that Pickands' constant does not equal 1/Γ(1/α) for small α and establishes a new lower bound using refined comparison techniques.
Findings
H_pickands' constant is greater than (1.1527)^{1/α}/Γ(1/α) for small α
The conjecture that H_α equals 1/Γ(1/α) is false for small α
Refined conditioning and comparison approach improves lower bounds
Abstract
Pickands' constants appear in various classical limit results about tail probabilities of suprema of Gaussian processes. It is an often quoted conjecture that perhaps for all , but it is also frequently observed that this doesn't seem compatible with evidence coming from simulations. We prove the conjecture is false for small , and in fact that for all sufficiently small . The proof is a refinement of the "conditioning and comparison" approach to lower bounds for upper tail probabilities, developed in a previous paper of the author. Some calculations of hitting probabilities for Brownian motion are also involved.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsFinancial Risk and Volatility Modeling · Risk and Portfolio Optimization · Probability and Risk Models
