A remark concerning sinc integrals
Uwe B\"asel

TL;DR
This paper provides a simplified proof of a known sinc integral result and extends the analysis to identify when the integral values fall below , revealing new thresholds at larger n.
Contribution
It offers a straightforward proof of Schmid's sinc integral result and determines new n-values where the integral drops below , expanding understanding of these integrals.
Findings
Proved that K_n= for n up to 55.
Showed K_n< for n .
Identified n-values (418 and 3091) where the integral drops below .
Abstract
We give a simple proof of Hanspeter Schmid's result that if , and if . Furthermore, we present two sinc integrals where the value is undercut as soon as and , respectively.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Algebra and Geometry · Advanced Operator Algebra Research · Holomorphic and Operator Theory
