Estimating nonlinear regression errors without doing regression
Hong Pi, Carsten Peterson

TL;DR
This paper introduces a novel method to estimate nonlinear regression errors and their distributions directly from data without performing regression, using conditional probabilities, which is computationally feasible and effective for complex systems.
Contribution
The paper presents a new approach to estimate nonlinear regression errors without regression, leveraging conditional probabilities and applied to chaotic maps with noise.
Findings
Successfully estimated errors for Ikeda and Lorenz maps
Detected nonlinearity by comparing residual errors
Extracted embedding dimensions of chaotic maps
Abstract
A method for estimating nonlinear regression errors and their distributions without performing regression is presented. Assuming continuity of the modeling function the variance is given in terms of conditional probabilities extracted from the data. For N data points the computational demand is N2. Comparing the predicted residual errors with those derived from a linear model assumption provides a signal for nonlinearity. The method is successfully illustrated with data generated by the Ikeda and Lorenz maps augmented with noise. As a by-product the embedding dimensions of these maps are also extracted.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsNeural Networks and Applications · Advanced Statistical Methods and Models · Control Systems and Identification
