Equivalence between hybrid CLs and bayesian methods for limit setting
Emmanuel Busato

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that hybrid CLs and Bayesian methods for limit setting are equivalent in single-channel counting experiments, even with uncertain background yields.
Contribution
It establishes the theoretical equivalence between hybrid CLs and Bayesian methods in the context of single-channel counting experiments with background uncertainties.
Findings
Hybrid CLs and Bayesian methods are equivalent in the single-channel case.
The equivalence holds even when background yields are not perfectly known.
The analysis is limited to counting experiments.
Abstract
The relation between hybrid CLs and bayesian methods used for limit setting is discussed. It is shown that the two methods are equivalent in the single channel case even when the background yield is not perfectly known. Only counting experiments are considered in this document.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsModel Reduction and Neural Networks · Fractional Differential Equations Solutions · Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design
