Interestingness a Unifying Paradigm Bipolar Function Composition
Iaakov Exman

TL;DR
This paper proposes a unifying paradigm for interestingness in knowledge discovery based on bipolar function composition, capturing relevance and unexpectedness as core semantic poles.
Contribution
It introduces a bipolar function composition framework that unifies various interestingness measures and highlights the importance of relevance and unexpectedness.
Findings
Demonstrates the generality of the paradigm through case studies
Shows how known interestingness functions fit into the framework
Identifies limitations via counter-examples
Abstract
Interestingness is an important criterion by which we judge knowledge discovery. But, interestingness has escaped all attempts to capture its intuitive meaning into a concise and comprehensive form. A unifying paradigm is formulated by function composition. We claim that composition is bipolar, i.e. composition of exactly two functions, whose two semantic poles are relevance and unexpectedness. The paradigm generality is demonstrated by case studies of new interestingness functions, examples of known functions that fit the framework, and counter-examples for which the paradigm points out to the lacking pole.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSemantic Web and Ontologies · AI-based Problem Solving and Planning · Cognitive Science and Mapping
