Weak Frobenius monads and Frobenius bimodules
Wisbauer Robert

TL;DR
This paper explores the conditions under which categories of modules and comodules are equivalent for non-unital monads and non-counital comonads, extending classical Frobenius theory.
Contribution
It introduces the concept of weak Frobenius monads and bimodules, generalizing Frobenius properties to non-unital and non-counital contexts.
Findings
Characterization of weak Frobenius monads
Conditions for equivalence of module and comodule categories
Extension of Frobenius theory to non-unital cases
Abstract
As shown by S. Eilenberg and J.C. Moore (1965), for a monad with right adjoint comonad on any catgeory , the category of unital -modules is isomorphic to the category of counital -comodules . The monad is Frobenius provided we have and then . Here we investigate which kind of equivalences can be obtained for non-unital monads (and non-counital comonads).
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAlgebraic structures and combinatorial models · Commutative Algebra and Its Applications · Rings, Modules, and Algebras
