An arborist's guide to the rationals
Katherine E. Stange

TL;DR
This paper explores the relationships between different infinite binary trees that enumerate positive rationals, providing a new proof connecting the Farey/Stern-Brocot, Calkin-Wilf, and Conway-Fung topograph trees.
Contribution
It introduces a novel proof linking these trees through the concept of 'transpose shadows' of a matrix tree, expanding understanding of their interrelations.
Findings
Unified perspective on rational enumeration trees
New proof connecting Farey/Stern-Brocot and Calkin-Wilf trees
Enhanced understanding of the topograph's role in rational trees
Abstract
There are two well-known ways to enumerate the positive rational numbers in an infinite binary tree: the Farey/Stern-Brocot tree and the Calkin-Wilf tree. In this brief note, we describe these two trees as `transpose shadows' of a tree of matrices (a result due to Backhouse and Ferreira) via a new proof using yet another famous tree of rationals: the topograph of Conway and Fung.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
Topicssemigroups and automata theory · Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms · Mathematics and Applications
