How the Quantum Sorites Phenomenon Strengthens Bell's Argument
Malcolm R. Forster

TL;DR
This paper clarifies how the Colbeck-Renner theorem, which is stronger than Bell's original theorem, relates to Bell's theorem by emphasizing the role of the Quantum Sorites Phenomenon in strengthening the argument.
Contribution
It explicitly connects the Colbeck-Renner theorem to Bell's theorem, highlighting the significance of the Quantum Sorites Phenomenon in strengthening nonlocality arguments.
Findings
Colbeck-Renner theorem is stronger than Bell's original theorem
The Quantum Sorites Phenomenon plays a key role in this strengthening
The paper clarifies the relationship between the two theorems
Abstract
Recently, Colbeck and Renner (2011) [arXiv:1005.5173] published a theorem that appears to be stronger than the Bell (1964) theorem in a way that is more significant than the other variations of Bell's theorem that have been published in the 50 years since Bell's theorem. Colbeck and Renner themselves do not relate their theorem directly to Bell's theorem, so here I present a version of the Colbeck-Renner theorem that makes the relationship explicit.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsQuantum Mechanics and Applications · Philosophy and History of Science · Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs
