Sampling and Representation Complexity of Revenue Maximization
Shaddin Dughmi, Li Han, Noam Nisan

TL;DR
This paper investigates the relationship between the number of samples needed and the complexity of representing approximately revenue-maximizing auctions, providing bounds and lower bounds on these complexities.
Contribution
It establishes tight bounds and an exponential lower bound linking sample complexity to the representation complexity of revenue-maximizing auctions.
Findings
Sample complexity is tightly related to auction representation complexity.
Provided upper bounds on the number of samples needed.
Proved an exponential lower bound on sample complexity.
Abstract
We consider (approximate) revenue maximization in auctions where the distribution on input valuations is given via "black box" access to samples from the distribution. We observe that the number of samples required -- the sample complexity -- is tightly related to the representation complexity of an approximately revenue-maximizing auction. Our main results are upper bounds and an exponential lower bound on these complexities.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAuction Theory and Applications · Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing · Game Theory and Voting Systems
