On the Phase Space of Block-Hiding Strategies in Bitcoin-like networks
Assaf Shomer

TL;DR
This paper analyzes the success probabilities of block-hiding strategies in Bitcoin-like networks, identifying conditions under which these strategies outperform standard mining and proposing a generalized measure of miner influence.
Contribution
It introduces a detailed probabilistic analysis of block-hiding strategies and generalizes the concept of miner influence based on relative hashing power.
Findings
Block-hiding strategies are advantageous above a certain influence threshold.
Two types of block-hiding strategies are characterized and compared.
The analysis extends the understanding of miner influence beyond traditional measures.
Abstract
We calculate the probability of success of block-hiding mining strategies in Bitcoin-like networks. These strategies involve building a secret branch of the block-tree and publishing it opportunistically, aiming to replace the top of the main branch and rip the reward associated with the secretly mined blocks. We identify two types of block-hiding strategies and chart the parameter space where those are more beneficial than the standard mining strategy described in Nakamoto's paper. Our analysis suggests a generalization of the notion of the relative hashing power as a measure for a miner's influence on the network. Block-hiding strategies are beneficial only when this measure of influence exceeds a certain threshold.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Steganography and Watermarking Techniques · Spam and Phishing Detection · Internet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting
