Computational Limits for Matrix Completion
Moritz Hardt, Raghu Meka, Prasad Raghavendra, and Benjamin Weitz

TL;DR
This paper proves that matrix completion remains computationally hard even under common assumptions like incoherence and high sampling, highlighting fundamental limits of efficient algorithms.
Contribution
It establishes the first complexity-theoretic hardness results for matrix completion with low rank and incoherence, using reductions from 4-Coloring.
Findings
Matrix completion is NP-hard even for rank 4 matrices with 90% observed entries.
Hardness persists under incoherence and constant rank output.
Provides new techniques for encoding combinatorial problems into low-rank matrix problems.
Abstract
Matrix Completion is the problem of recovering an unknown real-valued low-rank matrix from a subsample of its entries. Important recent results show that the problem can be solved efficiently under the assumption that the unknown matrix is incoherent and the subsample is drawn uniformly at random. Are these assumptions necessary? It is well known that Matrix Completion in its full generality is NP-hard. However, little is known if make additional assumptions such as incoherence and permit the algorithm to output a matrix of slightly higher rank. In this paper we prove that Matrix Completion remains computationally intractable even if the unknown matrix has rank but we are allowed to output any constant rank matrix, and even if additionally we assume that the unknown matrix is incoherent and are shown of the entries. This result relies on the conjectured hardness of the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSparse and Compressive Sensing Techniques · Tensor decomposition and applications · Stochastic Gradient Optimization Techniques
