Reply to a Commentary "Asking photons where they have been without telling them what to say"
A. Danan, D. Farfurnik, S. Bar-Ad, and L. Vaidman

TL;DR
This paper responds to objections raised against an experiment involving nested interferometers, analyzing and refuting the criticisms to clarify the original conclusions.
Contribution
It provides a detailed rebuttal to critiques of the nested interferometer experiment, clarifying the interpretation of photon paths.
Findings
Objections to the experiment are analyzed and refuted.
The original conclusions about photon behavior are reaffirmed.
Abstract
Interesting objections to conclusions of our experiment with nested interferometers raised by Salih in a recent Commentary are analysed and refuted.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsQuantum Mechanics and Applications · Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs · Philosophy and History of Science
