Copula Correlation: An Equitable Dependence Measure and Extension of Pearson's Correlation
A. Adam Ding, Yi Li

TL;DR
This paper introduces copula correlation (Ccor), a new dependence measure based on copula density, which is shown to be more equitable and easier to estimate than mutual information, with theoretical and numerical validation.
Contribution
The paper proposes Ccor, a novel dependence measure based on copula density, demonstrating its equitability and estimation advantages over mutual information.
Findings
Ccor is equitable under new definitions of equitability.
Ccor is easier to estimate than mutual information.
Numerical studies confirm the theoretical properties of Ccor.
Abstract
In Science, Reshef et al. (2011) proposed the concept of equitability for measures of dependence between two random variables. To this end, they proposed a novel measure, the maximal information coefficient (MIC). Recently a PNAS paper (Kinney and Atwal, 2014) gave a mathematical definition for equitability. They proved that MIC in fact is not equitable, while a fundamental information theoretic measure, the mutual information (MI), is self-equitable. In this paper, we show that MI also does not correctly reflect the proportion of deterministic signals hidden in noisy data. We propose a new equitability definition based on this scenario. The copula correlation (Ccor), based on the L1-distance of copula density, is shown to be equitable under both definitions. We also prove theoretically that Ccor is much easier to estimate than MI. Numerical studies illustrate the properties of the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsFinancial Risk and Volatility Modeling · Complex Systems and Time Series Analysis · Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
