Variations of Kurepa's left factorial hypothesis
Romeo Me\v{s}trovi\'c

TL;DR
This paper explores various formulations and generalizations of Kurepa's hypothesis, investigates divisibility properties of associated determinants, and provides computational evidence and counterexamples related to the hypothesis.
Contribution
It introduces a new formulation of Kurepa's hypothesis using Kurepa's determinants and proves the 'even part' of a strong generalized hypothesis, while identifying a counterexample to its 'odd composite part.'
Findings
Proved the 'even part' of the strong Kurepa's hypothesis.
Identified 11563 as a counterexample to the 'odd composite part.'
Presented divisibility properties and computational results related to derangement and Bell numbers.
Abstract
Kurepa's hypothesis asserts that for each integer the greatest common divisor of and is . Motivated by an equivalent formulation of this hypothesis involving derangement numbers, here we give a formulation of Kurepa's hypothesis in terms of divisibility of any Kurepa's determinant of order by a prime . In the previous version of this article we have proposed the strong Kurepa's hypothesis involving a general Kurepa's determinant with any integer . We prove the ``even part'' of this hypothesis which can be considered as a generalization of Kurepa's hypothesis. However, by using a congruence for involving the derangement number with an odd integer , we find that the integer is a counterexample to the ``odd composite part'' of strong Kurepa's hypothesis. We also…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Combinatorial Mathematics · Advanced Mathematical Identities · graph theory and CDMA systems
