Reply to Comment by Vanderbilt, Souza and Haldane: arXiv:1312.4200
Y. Chen, D.L. Bergman, A.A. Burkov
TL;DR
This paper defends the position that the non-quantized Weyl node contribution to anomalous Hall conductivity is not a Fermi surface property, countering claims by Vanderbilt, Souza, and Haldane.
Contribution
It clarifies the nature of Weyl node contributions to anomalous Hall conductivity and refutes the claim that it is a Fermi surface property.
Findings
Reasserts that Weyl node contribution is not a Fermi surface property.
Counter-argument to Vanderbilt, Souza, and Haldane's claim.
Clarifies the theoretical understanding of anomalous Hall conductivity.
Abstract
We reassert our statement that the non-quantized Weyl node contribution to the anomalous Hall conductivity is not a Fermi surface property, contrary to the claim by Vanderbilt, Souza and Haldane.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsQuantum and electron transport phenomena · Topological Materials and Phenomena · Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism