Upper semicomputable sumtests for lower semicomputable semimeasures
Bruno Bauwens

TL;DR
This paper characterizes upper semicomputable sumtests for lower semicomputable semimeasures using Kolmogorov complexity, establishing bounds on their size and their relation to the Halting problem, with implications for understanding their pathological behavior.
Contribution
It provides a characterization of upper semicomputable sumtests relative to lower semicomputable semimeasures and analyzes their size bounds and complexity-theoretic properties.
Findings
Logarithm of such tests is bounded by |x| + O( |x|)
Existence of tests exceeding |x| - O( |x|) infinitely often
Tests are large only for strings with high mutual information with the Halting problem
Abstract
A sumtest for a discrete semimeasure is a function mapping bitstrings to non-negative rational numbers such that \[ \sum P(x)f(x) \le 1 \,. \] Sumtests are the discrete analogue of Martin-L\"of tests. The behavior of sumtests for computable seems well understood, but for some applications lower semicomputable seem more appropriate. In the case of tests for independence, it is natural to consider upper semicomputable tests (see [B.Bauwens and S.Terwijn, Theory of Computing Systems 48.2 (2011): 247-268]). In this paper, we characterize upper semicomputable sumtests relative to any lower semicomputable semimeasures using Kolmogorov complexity. It is studied to what extend such tests are pathological: can upper semicomputable sumtests for be large? It is shown that the logarithm of such tests does not exceed (where denotes…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsComputability, Logic, AI Algorithms · semigroups and automata theory · DNA and Biological Computing
