One formation of finite groups
Viachaslau I. Murashka

TL;DR
This paper proves that two different formations of finite groups, introduced by separate researchers, are actually the same, unifying their concepts in group theory.
Contribution
It demonstrates the equivalence of two distinct formations of finite groups, clarifying their relationship in the field.
Findings
The two formations are proven to coincide.
This unification simplifies the understanding of these group formations.
The result resolves a previously open question about their relationship.
Abstract
It is shown that two formations of finite groups, one was introduced by V.S. Monakhov and V.N. Kniahina and another one was introduced by R. Brandl, are coincides.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsFinite Group Theory Research · Coding theory and cryptography · graph theory and CDMA systems
