Hamiltonian chordal graphs are not cycle extendible
Manuel Lafond, Ben Seamone

TL;DR
This paper disproves Hendry's 1990 conjecture that all Hamiltonian chordal graphs are cycle extendible by providing counterexamples for all sufficiently large graphs and exploring conditions involving forbidden subgraphs.
Contribution
It constructs the first known counterexamples to the conjecture for any n ≥ 15 and analyzes cycle extendibility under specific forbidden subgraph conditions.
Findings
Counterexamples exist for all n ≥ 15
Non-extendible cycles can be arbitrarily small proportion of the graph
Cycle extendibility varies with forbidden subgraphs
Abstract
In 1990, Hendry conjectured that every Hamiltonian chordal graph is cycle extendible; that is, the vertices of any non-Hamiltonian cycle are contained in a cycle of length one greater. We disprove this conjecture by constructing counterexamples on vertices for any . Furthermore, we show that there exist counterexamples where the ratio of the length of a non-extendible cycle to the total number of vertices can be made arbitrarily small. We then consider cycle extendibility in Hamiltonian chordal graphs where certain induced subgraphs are forbidden, notably and the bull.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Graph Theory Research · Limits and Structures in Graph Theory · graph theory and CDMA systems
