No stagnation in the growth of population
Ron W Nielsen aka Jan Nurzynski

TL;DR
This paper argues that human population growth has not stagnated, challenging the Malthusian stagnation concept, and attributes minor fluctuations to demographic catastrophes based on empirical evidence.
Contribution
It provides empirical evidence against the idea of Malthusian stagnation, highlighting continuous population growth despite catastrophic events.
Findings
Population growth shows no signs of stagnation.
Minor disturbances linked to demographic catastrophes.
Empirical evidence contradicts Malthusian stagnation concept.
Abstract
Growth of human population shows no signs of stagnation. The only small disturbance is identified as being probably associated with the coinciding impacts of five demographic catastrophes. The concept of the Epoch of Malthusian Stagnation is convincingly contradicted by empirical evidence.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsEconomic Growth and Productivity · Sustainable Development and Environmental Policy · Global Health Care Issues
