On the metallicity of open clusters II. Spectroscopy

TL;DR

This paper compiles and analyzes high-resolution spectroscopic metallicities of open clusters to improve calibration and understand Galactic chemical evolution, revealing discrepancies with models and photometric estimates.

Contribution

It provides a comprehensive, high-quality set of open cluster metallicities from high-resolution spectroscopy, aiding calibration and Galactic evolution studies.

Findings

Spectroscopic metallicities are systematically higher than photometric ones by about 0.1 dex.

Differences in analysis methods impact metallicity more than observational quality.

Current models do not predict the observed radial metallicity gradient.

Abstract

In a series of three papers, we investigate the current status of published metallicities for open clusters that were derived from a variety of photometric and spectroscopic methods. The current article focuses on spectroscopic methods. The aim is to compile a comprehensive set of clusters with the most reliable metallicities from high-resolution spectroscopic studies. This set of metallicities will be the basis for a calibration of metallicities from different methods. The literature was searched for [Fe/H] estimates of individual member stars of open clusters based on the analysis of high-resolution spectra. For comparison, we also compiled [Fe/H] estimates based on spectra with low and intermediate resolution. At medium and high resolution, we found that differences in the analysis methods have a stronger effect on metallicity than quality differences in the observations. We retained only highly probable cluster members and introduced a restriction on atmospheric parameters. We combined 641 individual metallicity values for 458 stars in 78 open clusters from 86 publications to form our final set of high-quality cluster metallicities. The photometric metallicities discussed in the first paper of this series are systematically lower than the spectroscopic ones by about 0.1 dex, and the differences show a scatter of about 0.2 dex. In a preliminary comparison of our spectroscopic sample with models of Galactic chemical evolution, none of the models predicts the observed radial metallicity gradient. Photometric metallicities show a large intrinsic dispersion, while the more accurate spectroscopic sample presented in this paper comprises fewer than half the number of clusters. Only a sophisticated combination of all available photometric and spectroscopic data will allow us to trace the metallicity distribution in the Galactic disk on a local and global scale.