Stanley-Wilf limits are typically exponential
Jacob Fox

TL;DR
This paper disproves the conjecture that Stanley-Wilf limits grow quadratically with permutation size, showing instead that for most permutations, these limits grow exponentially with the permutation length.
Contribution
The paper demonstrates that Stanley-Wilf limits are typically exponential, contradicting previous conjectures of quadratic growth for all permutations.
Findings
Stanley-Wilf limits are typically exponential in permutation length.
The quadratic growth conjecture for Stanley-Wilf limits is false for most permutations.
Almost all permutations have Stanley-Wilf limits growing as 2^{k^{Θ(1)}}.
Abstract
For a permutation , let be the number of permutations on letters avoiding . Marcus and Tardos proved the celebrated Stanley-Wilf conjecture that exists and is finite. Backed by numerical evidence, it has been conjectured by many researchers over the years that for every permutation on letters. We disprove this conjecture, showing that for almost all permutations on letters.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsBayesian Methods and Mixture Models · Statistical Distribution Estimation and Applications · Advanced Combinatorial Mathematics
