Avoiding 2-binomial squares and cubes
M. Rao, M. Rigo, P. Salimov

TL;DR
This paper investigates the avoidance of 2-binomial squares and cubes in words generated by morphic rules, establishing minimal alphabet sizes for their avoidance, which are proven to be optimal.
Contribution
It proves that 2-binomial squares and cubes are avoidable over minimal alphabets in the context of pure morphic words, extending combinatorial word theory.
Findings
2-binomial squares are avoidable over a 3-letter alphabet
2-binomial cubes are avoidable over a 2-letter alphabet
The alphabet sizes used are proven to be optimal
Abstract
Two finite words are 2-binomially equivalent if, for all words of length at most 2, the number of occurrences of as a (scattered) subword of is equal to the number of occurrences of in . This notion is a refinement of the usual abelian equivalence. A 2-binomial square is a word where and are 2-binomially equivalent. In this paper, considering pure morphic words, we prove that 2-binomial squares (resp. cubes) are avoidable over a 3-letter (resp. 2-letter) alphabet. The sizes of the alphabets are optimal.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
Topicssemigroups and automata theory · Coding theory and cryptography · DNA and Biological Computing
