Synopsis of the workshop on humor and cognition
Douglas Hofstadter, Liane Gabora

TL;DR
This paper summarizes a workshop on humor and cognition, exploring how frame blending and analogy-making contribute to humor, proposing the concept of ur-jokes, and discussing theories and the adaptive value of humor.
Contribution
It introduces the concept of ur-jokes, connects frame blending with humor, and compares multiple humor theories within a cognitive framework.
Findings
Frame blends can produce different types of humor.
Jokes can be mapped into an analogy-based microworld, revealing structural similarities.
The concept of ur-jokes captures the abstract core of humor.
Abstract
We summarize the proceedings of the Workshop on Humor and. The principal type of humor considered, slippage humor, is defined and contrasted with aggression-based humor. A variety of slippage humor, based on Hofstadter's notion of a frame blend, is presented. Given that a frame is a small coherent cluster of concepts pertaining to a single topic (similar to a script), a frame blend results when elements extracted from two distinct frames are spliced together to yield a new hybrid frame. Diverse ways of blending two frames can produce varying degrees and types of humor. Studies of this phenomenon are presented. We discuss the connection between frame blends and analogies, focusing on the Copycat domain: an idealized microworld in which analogy making can be studied and modeled on computer. It is shown how jokes can be mapped into that domain, giving rise to a kind of abstract microworld…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsHumor Studies and Applications · Artificial Intelligence in Games
