Discovering the Significance of 5 sigma
Louis Lyons

TL;DR
This paper examines the traditional 5 sigma significance criterion in particle physics discoveries and explores whether a more nuanced approach could improve the reliability of scientific claims.
Contribution
It introduces the idea that the standard 5 sigma threshold may be insufficient and proposes considering alternative methods for assessing discovery significance.
Findings
Questioning the adequacy of the 5 sigma criterion
Suggesting a more nuanced significance assessment
Implications for future particle physics discoveries
Abstract
We discuss the traditional criterion for discovery in Particle Physics of requiring a significance corresponding to at least 5 sigma; and whether a more nuanced approach might be better.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsTraditional Chinese Medicine Studies
