On the optimality of approximation schemes for the classical scheduling problem
Lin Chen, Klaus Jansen, Guochuan Zhang

TL;DR
This paper establishes near-optimality results for approximation schemes in classical scheduling problems, showing that current algorithms are essentially the best possible under the Exponential Time Hypothesis (ETH).
Contribution
It proves the optimality bounds of existing FPTAS and PTAS algorithms for scheduling on identical machines under ETH, and introduces new reductions from 3SAT for these problems.
Findings
FPTAS for fixed number of machines is essentially optimal under ETH.
PTAS for arbitrary machines is nearly optimal under ETH.
New reductions from 3SAT provide insights into scheduling problem complexity.
Abstract
We consider the classical scheduling problem on parallel identical machines to minimize the makespan, and achieve the following results under the Exponential Time Hypothesis (ETH) 1. The scheduling problem on a constant number of identical machines, which is denoted as , is known to admit a fully polynomial time approximation scheme (FPTAS) of running time (indeed, the algorithm works for an even more general problem where machines are unrelated). We prove this algorithm is essentially the best possible in the sense that a time FPTAS for any implies that ETH fails. 2. The scheduling problem on an arbitrary number of identical machines, which is denoted as , is known to admit a polynomial time approximation scheme (PTAS) of running time…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsOptimization and Search Problems · Complexity and Algorithms in Graphs · Advanced Graph Theory Research
