The Dragon and the Computer: Why Intellectual Property Theft is Compatible with Chinese Cyber-Warfare Doctrine

TL;DR

This paper analyzes how Chinese military doctrines like 'Unrestricted Warfare' and 'Active Offense' justify intellectual property theft within cyber-warfare, exemplified by Operation Aurora targeting U.S. firms.

Contribution

It links Chinese cyber-operations to military doctrines, showing how these ideas enable intellectual property theft in cyber-warfare contexts.

Findings

Chinese military thought influences cyber-operations

Operation Aurora exemplifies doctrine in practice

Intellectual property theft aligns with 'Unrestricted Warfare' principles

Abstract

Along with the USA and Russia, China is often considered one of the leading cyber-powers in the world. In this excerpt, we explore how Chinese military thought, developed in the 1990s, influenced their cyber-operations in the early 2000s. In particular, we examine the ideas of "Unrestricted Warfare" and "Active Offense" and discuss how they can permit for the theft of intellectual property. We then specifically look at how the case study of Operation Aurora, a cyber-operation directed against many major U.S. technology and defense firms, reflects some of these ideas.