First experimental results of very high accuracy centroiding measurements for the neat astrometric mission
A. Crouzier, F. Malbet, O. Preis, F. Henault, P. Kern, G. Martin, P., Feautrier, E. Stadler, S. Lafrasse, A. Delboulbe, E. Behar, M. Saint-Pe, J., Dupont, S. Potin, C. Cara, M. Donati, E. Doumayrou, P. O. Lagage, A. Leger,, J. M. LeDuigou, M. Shao, R. Goullioud

TL;DR
This paper reports initial experimental results demonstrating high-precision centroid measurements crucial for the NEAT astrometric mission, achieving a pixel position accuracy of about 1e-4 pixel, advancing towards the 5e-6 pixel goal.
Contribution
It introduces a testbed with metrology and pseudo stellar sources, providing a performance model and error budget, and reports first light data showing promising centroid measurement accuracy.
Findings
Achieved pixel position measurement accuracy of about 1e-4 pixel.
Developed a testbed with metrology and pseudo stellar sources for high-precision centroiding.
Presented a performance model and error budget for the experiment.
Abstract
NEAT is an astrometric mission proposed to ESA with the objectives of detecting Earth-like exoplanets in the habitable zone of nearby solar-type stars. NEAT requires the capability to measure stellar centroids at the precision of 5e-6 pixel. Current state-of-the-art methods for centroid estimation have reached a precision of about 2e-5 pixel at two times Nyquist sampling, this was shown at the JPL by the VESTA experiment. A metrology system was used to calibrate intra and inter pixel quantum efficiency variations in order to correct pixelation errors. The European part of the NEAT consortium is building a testbed in vacuum in order to achieve 5e-6 pixel precision for the centroid estimation. The goal is to provide a proof of concept for the precision requirement of the NEAT spacecraft. In this paper we present the metrology and the pseudo stellar sources sub-systems, we present a…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
