Comment on "On the proper behavior of atoms" by Paul Anglin
Russell K. Standish, Stephen L. Keen

TL;DR
This paper addresses and corrects misunderstandings in a critique of the authors' analysis of neoclassical firm theory, providing clarifications and a new argument to replace a flawed one.
Contribution
The authors clarify their original assumptions, correct misconceptions, and introduce a new argument to improve their analysis of neoclassical firm theory.
Findings
Corrected misunderstandings about assumptions
Identified and acknowledged a valid criticism
Presented a new, improved argument
Abstract
Paul Anglin criticised our analysis of the neoclassical theory of the firm, but makes a number of incorrect assertions about our assumptions. We correct these misunderstandings, but acknowledge that one criticism he makes is correct. We correct this flaw with a new argument that supersedes the flawed strategic reaction argument we presented in our previous paper.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGame Theory and Applications · Business Strategy and Innovation · Economic Theory and Institutions
