The Late-Pleistocene extinction of megafauna compared with the growth of human population
Ron W Nielsen

TL;DR
This study compares the timing of late-Pleistocene megafauna extinctions with human population growth, finding no correlation and suggesting humans had minimal environmental impact during that period.
Contribution
It provides evidence that human population growth was not a significant factor in megafauna extinctions during the late Pleistocene.
Findings
No correlation between megafauna extinction and human population growth.
Human population size and growth rate were too small to impact megafauna.
Extinction events occurred independently of human demographic changes.
Abstract
Time-dependent distribution of the global extinction of megafauna is compared with the growth of human population. There is no correlation between the two processes. Furthermore, the size of human population and its growth rate were far too small to have any significant impact on the environment and on the life of megafauna.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsPrimate Behavior and Ecology · Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology · Evolution and Paleontology Studies
