How conventional measures overestimate electroweak fine-tuning in supersymmetric theory
Howard Baer, Vernon Barger, Dan Mickelson

TL;DR
This paper compares three measures of electroweak fine-tuning in supersymmetric models, highlighting how they differ in estimating naturalness and suggesting that the model-independent measure may better reflect true fine-tuning levels.
Contribution
It introduces and compares three fine-tuning measures in SUSY models, emphasizing the importance of correlations and the potential for lower true fine-tuning with the model-independent measure.
Findings
mSUGRA/CMSSM is highly fine-tuned under all measures
NUHM2 appears fine-tuned with el_HS,BG > 10^3
el_EW can indicate low fine-tuning (~7), suggesting possible natural models
Abstract
The lack of evidence for superparticles at the CERN LHC, along with the rather high value of the Higgs mass, has sharpened the perception that supersymmetric model parameter space is highly electroweak fine-tuned (EWFT). We compare three measures of fine-tuning in SUSY models. 1. \Del_HS measures a terms containing large log contributions to m_Z that are inevitable in models defined at scales much higher than the electroweak scale. 2. \Del_BG measures variation in m_Z against variation of model parameters and allows for correlations among high scale parameters which are not included in \Del_HS. 3. The model-independent \Del_EW measures how naturally a model can generate the measured value of m_Z=91.2 GeV in terms of weak scale parameters alone. We hypothesize an overarching Ultimate Theory (UTH) wherein the high scale soft terms are all correlated. The UTH might be contained within the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
