Initial versus tangent stiffness-based Rayleigh damping in inelastic time history seismic analyses
Pierre Jehel (MSSMat, CEEM), Pierre L\'eger, Adnan Ibrahimbegovic, (LMT)

TL;DR
This paper compares initial and tangent stiffness-based Rayleigh damping models in inelastic seismic analyses, providing insights and tools for practitioners to select and design damping models that maintain desired damping ratios during inelastic structural response.
Contribution
It offers a comprehensive comparison of initial versus tangent stiffness-based Rayleigh damping, including analytical tools for better damping control in inelastic seismic analyses.
Findings
Tangent stiffness-based damping can better control damping ratios during inelastic response.
Initial stiffness damping may lead to less accurate damping ratio control.
The paper provides practical guidelines for damping model selection and design.
Abstract
In the inelastic time history analyses of structures in seismic motion, part of the seismic energy that is imparted to the structure is absorbed by the inelastic structural model, and Rayleigh damping is commonly used in practice as an additional energy dissipation source. It has been acknowledged that Rayleigh damping models lack physical consistency and that, in turn, it must be carefully used to avoid encountering unintended consequences as the appearance of artificial damping. There are concerns raised by the mass proportional part of Rayleigh damping, but they are not considered in this paper. As far as the stiffness proportional part of Rayleigh damping is concerned, either the initial structural stiffness or the updated tangent stiffness can be used. The objective of this paper is to provide a comprehensive comparison of these two types of Rayleigh damping models so that a…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
