Letter to the editor: Against the Resilience of Rejected Manuscripts
Nicolas Robinson-Garcia, Daniel Torres-Salinas, J.M. Campanario and, Emilio Delgado L\'opez-C\'ozar

TL;DR
This paper advocates for standardized guidelines and protocols in online journal systems to improve tracking and sharing of rejected manuscript reports, aiming to enhance the peer review process.
Contribution
It proposes developing guidelines and protocols for better management and sharing of rejected manuscript information across journals.
Findings
Proposed guidelines for manuscript tracking
Suggested protocols for referee report exchange
Emphasized importance of standardized peer review processes
Abstract
In this letter we propose the development of guidelines by the main editors associations as well as protocols within online journal management systems for keeping track of rejected manuscripts that are resubmitted as well as for the interchange of referees reports between journals.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSemantic Web and Ontologies · Scientific Computing and Data Management · Research Data Management Practices
