Neutral pion cross section and spin asymmetries at intermediate pseudorapidity in polarized proton collisions at sqrt{s} = 200 GeV
STAR Collaboration: L. Adamczyk, J. K. Adkins, G. Agakishiev, M. M., Aggarwal, Z. Ahammed, I. Alekseev, J. Alford, C. D. Anson, A. Aparin, D., Arkhipkin, E. C. Aschenauer, G. S. Averichev, J. Balewski, A. Banerjee, B., Barber, Z. Barnovska, D. R. Beavis, R. Bellwied, A. Bhasin

TL;DR
This paper reports measurements of neutral pion production and spin asymmetries in polarized proton collisions at 200 GeV, providing insights into gluon contributions to proton spin and testing QCD predictions at intermediate pseudorapidity.
Contribution
It presents the first measurements of neutral pion cross sections and various spin asymmetries at intermediate pseudorapidity, extending understanding of proton spin structure and QCD models.
Findings
Cross section aligns with NLO pQCD calculations within uncertainties.
Measured A_LL is consistent with models, constraining gluon polarization.
A_N is small and consistent with twist-3 model predictions.
Abstract
The differential cross section and spin asymmetries for neutral pions produced within the intermediate pseudorapidity range 0.8 < {\eta} < 2.0 in polarized proton-proton collisions at sqrt{s} = 200 GeV are presented. Neutral pions were detected using the endcap electromagnetic calorimeter in the STAR detector at RHIC. The cross section was measured over a transverse momentum range of 5 < p_T < 16 GeV/c and is found to be within the scale uncertainty of a next-to-leading order perturbative QCD calculation. The longitudinal double-spin asymmetry, A_LL, is measured in the same pseudorapidity range. This quantity is sensitive to the gluonic contribution to the proton spin, {\Delta}g(x), at low Bjorken-x (down to x approx 0.01), where it is less constrained by measurements at central pseudorapidity. The measured A_LL is consistent with model predictions. The parity-violating asymmetry, A_L,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
