Modelling the X-ray polarimetric signatures of complex geometry: the case study of the "changing look" AGN NGC 1365
Frederic Marin, Delphine Porquet, Rene W. Goosmann, Michal Dovciak,, Fabio Muleri, Nicolas Grosso, Vladimir Karas

TL;DR
This study models X-ray polarimetric signatures of complex geometries in changing look AGN NGC 1365, distinguishing between relativistic reflection and absorption scenarios through polarization predictions, aiding future observational interpretation.
Contribution
It provides the first polarisation predictions for a changing look AGN, comparing relativistic reflection and absorption models to help interpret X-ray polarimetry data.
Findings
Relativistic reflection produces stronger net polarisation.
Polarisation angle varies smoothly in reflection, abruptly in absorption.
Predictions suggest future missions can distinguish models.
Abstract
"Changing look" Active Galactic Nuclei (AGN) are a subset of Seyfert galaxies characterized by rapid transitions between Compton-thin and Compton-thick regimes. In their Compton-thin state, the central engine is less obscured, hence spectroscopy or timing observations can probe their innermost structures. However, it is not clear if the observed emission features and the Compton hump are associated with relativistic reflection onto the accretion disc, or complex absorption by distant, absorbing gas clouds passing by the observer's line-of-sight. Here, we investigate these two scenarios under the scope of X-ray polarimetry, providing the first polarisation predictions for an archetypal "changing look" AGN: NGC 1365. We explore the resulting polarisation emerging from lamp-post emission and scattering off an accretion disc in the immediate vicinity of a supermassive black hole. The…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
