Second comment on "Dense and nanometric electronic excitations induced by swift heavy ions in an ionic CaF2 crystal: Evidence for two thresholds of damage creation"
Marko Karlusic

TL;DR
This paper reinterprets previous experimental data on swift heavy ion tracks in CaF2, clarifying the nature of the velocity effect and proposing explanations within the thermal spike model.
Contribution
It offers a new interpretation of existing data on ion-induced damage in CaF2, resolving controversy over the velocity effect using the thermal spike model.
Findings
Reinterpretation of previous experimental data.
Explanation for the missing velocity effect.
Support for the thermal spike model in damage creation.
Abstract
Controversy over nature and existence of the velocity effect [G. Szenes, Phys. Rev. B 87, 056101 (2013)], [M. Toulemonde et al., Phys. Rev. B 87, 056102 (2013)] reignited after new experimental data on swift heavy ion tracks in CaF2 was reported recently [M. Toulemonde et al., Phys. Rev. B 85, 054112 (2012)]. Here we show that results of the analysis in ref. [G. Szenes, Phys. Rev. B 87, 056101 (2013)] should be interpreted differently within analytical thermal spike model. We also propose explanation for apparently missing velocity effect.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsIon-surface interactions and analysis · Solid-state spectroscopy and crystallography
