On Discovering Electromagnetic Emission from Neutron Star Mergers: The Early Years of Two Gravitational Wave Detectors
Mansi M. Kasliwal, Samaya Nissanke

TL;DR
This paper evaluates the prospects of detecting electromagnetic counterparts to gravitational wave events from neutron star mergers during the early operation of two advanced LIGO detectors, highlighting localization improvements and observational strategies.
Contribution
It introduces a simulation showing how amplitude and phase information refine GW localization to manageable areas, and discusses the implications of detector sensitivity and sky quadrant bias for EM follow-up.
Findings
Localization areas can be narrowed to ~250 deg^2 using amplitude and phase info.
GW sensitivity with two detectors is limited to two sky quadrants, affecting detection rates.
North American and Southern African observatories can respond hours earlier than others.
Abstract
We present the first simulation addressing the prospects of finding an electromagnetic (EM) counterpart to gravitational wave detections (GW) during the early years of only two advanced interferometers. The perils of such a search may have appeared insurmountable when considering the coarse ring-shaped GW localizations spanning thousands of deg^2 using time-of-arrival information alone. We show that leveraging the amplitude and phase information of the predicted GW signal narrows the localization to arcs with a median area of only ~250 deg^2, thereby making an EM search tractable. Based on the locations and orientations of the two LIGO detectors, we find that the GW sensitivity is limited to one polarization and thus to only two sky quadrants. Thus, the rates of GW events with two interferometers is only ~40% of the rate with three interferometers of similar sensitivity. Another…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
