Quantum discord determines the interferometric power of quantum states
Davide Girolami, Alexandre M. Souza, Vittorio Giovannetti, Tommaso, Tufarelli, Jefferson G. Filgueiras, Roberto S. Sarthour, Diogo O., Soares-Pinto, Ivan S. Oliveira, Gerardo Adesso

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that quantum discord quantifies the worst-case precision in quantum interferometric sensing, with experimental validation showing discordant states outperform classically correlated ones in parameter estimation.
Contribution
It introduces a new measure linking quantum discord to interferometric sensing performance and provides the first experimental proof of discord's role in quantum metrology.
Findings
Quantum discord determines the worst-case precision in quantum interferometry.
Discordant states enable nonzero estimation precision across various Hamiltonians.
Classically correlated states fail to guarantee estimation in the worst-case scenario.
Abstract
Quantum metrology exploits quantum mechanical laws to improve the precision in estimating technologically relevant parameters such as phase, frequency, or magnetic fields. Probe states are usually tailored on the particular dynamics whose parameters are being estimated. Here we consider a novel framework where quantum estimation is performed in an interferometric configuration, using bipartite probe states prepared when only the spectrum of the generating Hamiltonian is known. We introduce a figure of merit for the scheme, given by the worst case precision over all suitable Hamiltonians, and prove that it amounts exactly to a computable measure of discord-type quantum correlations for the input probe. We complement our theoretical results with a metrology experiment, realized in a highly controllable room-temperature nuclear magnetic resonance setup, which provides a proof-of-concept…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
