Testing surface area with arbitrary accuracy
Joe Neeman

TL;DR
This paper improves the analysis of an algorithm for testing the surface area of sets in high-dimensional spaces, achieving arbitrary accuracy and extending to Riemannian manifolds.
Contribution
It refines the constant factor in the surface area testing algorithm to be arbitrarily close to 1 and extends the method to general measures on Riemannian manifolds.
Findings
Constant factor improved to 1 + η for any η > 0
Algorithm extended to Riemannian manifolds
Enhanced analysis of surface area testing algorithm
Abstract
Recently, Kothari et al.\ gave an algorithm for testing the surface area of an arbitrary set . Specifically, they gave a randomized algorithm such that if 's surface area is less than then the algorithm will accept with high probability, and if the algorithm accepts with high probability then there is some perturbation of with surface area at most . Here, is a dimension-dependent constant which is strictly larger than 1 if , and grows to as . We give an improved analysis of Kothari et al.'s algorithm. In doing so, we replace the constant with for arbitrary. We also extend the algorithm to more general measures on Riemannian manifolds.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMorphological variations and asymmetry · Point processes and geometric inequalities · Computational Geometry and Mesh Generation
