Periastron advance in spinning black hole binaries: comparing effective-one-body and Numerical Relativity
Tanja Hinderer, Alessandra Buonanno, Abdul H. Mrou\'e, Daniel A., Hemberger, Geoffrey Lovelace, Harald P. Pfeiffer, Lawrence E. Kidder, Mark A., Scheel, Bela Szilagyi, Nicholas W. Taylor, and Saul A. Teukolsky

TL;DR
This study compares effective-one-body predictions with numerical relativity simulations for periastron advance in spinning black hole binaries, showing excellent agreement across various spins and mass ratios without calibration.
Contribution
It demonstrates that the effective-one-body formalism accurately predicts periastron advance in spinning black hole binaries without requiring numerical-relativity calibration.
Findings
Remarkable agreement between EOB and numerical relativity for a wide range of parameters.
EOB model's key ingredients include a symmetrized mapping and resummation of spin corrections.
Analytical expressions derived for extreme mass-ratio limit with spin effects.
Abstract
We compute the periastron advance using the effective-one-body formalism for binary black holes moving on quasi-circular orbits and having spins collinear with the orbital angular momentum. We compare the predictions with the periastron advance recently computed in accurate numerical-relativity simulations and find remarkable agreement for a wide range of spins and mass ratios. These results do not use any numerical-relativity calibration of the effective-one-body model, and stem from two key ingredients in the effective-one-body Hamiltonian: (i) the mapping of the two-body dynamics of spinning particles onto the dynamics of an effective spinning particle in a (deformed) Kerr spacetime, fully symmetrized with respect to the two-body masses and spins, and (ii) the resummation, in the test-particle limit, of all post-Newtonian (PN) corrections linear in the spin of the particle. In fact,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
