A fundamental metallicity relation for galaxies at z = 0.84 - 1.47 from HiZELS
John P. Stott (Durham), David Sobral (Leiden), Richard Bower (Durham),, Ian Smail (Durham), Philip N. Best (Edinburgh), Yuichi Matsuda (NAOJ), Masao, Hayashi (Tokyo), James E. Geach (Herts), Tadayuki Kodama (NAOJ)

TL;DR
This study confirms the existence of a fundamental metallicity relation at z=0.84-1.47, similar to the local universe, indicating early metal enrichment and providing new insights into galaxy evolution at high redshift.
Contribution
First homogeneously selected study demonstrating a fundamental metallicity relation at z=1-1.5, revealing similarities to local galaxies and suggesting early metal enrichment processes.
Findings
Galaxies at z=1-1.5 follow a relation similar to local universe.
Metallicity at high redshift is comparable to low redshift for similar mass and SFR.
Evidence of a flattened mass-metallicity relation at high redshift.
Abstract
We obtained Subaru FMOS observations of Halpha emitting galaxies selected from the HiZELS narrow-band survey, to investigate the relationship between stellar mass, metallicity and star-formation rate at z = 0.84 - 1.47, for comparison with the Fundamental Metallicity Relation seen at low redshift. Our findings demonstrate, for the first time with a homogeneously selected sample, that a relationship exists for typical star-forming galaxies at z = 1 - 1.5 and that it is surprisingly similar to that seen locally. Therefore, star-forming galaxies at z = 1 - 1.5 are no less metal abundant than galaxies of similar mass and star formation rate (SFR) at z = 0.1, contrary to claims from some earlier studies. We conclude that the bulk of the metal enrichment for this star-forming galaxy population takes place in the 4 Gyr before z = 1.5. We fit a new mass-metallicity-SFR plane to our data which…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
