Development Towards Sustainability: How to judge past and proposed policies?
Michael Dittmar (Institute of Particle Physics, ETH Zurich,, Switzerland)

TL;DR
This paper proposes a scientific method based on negation to define sustainability goals, evaluate policies, and quantify the transition speed needed to avoid environmental collapse and achieve sustainability.
Contribution
It introduces a novel approach using negation and natural capital dynamics to assess sustainability and policy effectiveness quantitatively.
Findings
A method to define sustainability goals unambiguously.
Quantification of transition speeds to sustainability.
Framework to evaluate policy impacts on natural capital.
Abstract
The scientific data about the state of our planet, presented at the 2012 (Rio+20) summit, documented that today's human family lives even less sustainably than it did in 1992. The data indicate furthermore that the environmental impacts from our current economic activities are so large, that we are approaching situations where potentially controllable regional problems can easily lead to uncontrollable global disasters. Assuming that (1) the majority of the human family, once adequately informed, wants to achieve a "sustainable way of life" and (2) that the "development towards sustainability" roadmap will be based on scientific principles, one must begin with unambiguous and quantifiable definitions of these goals. As will be demonstrated, the well known scientific method to define abstract and complex issues by their negation, satisfies these requirements. Following this new…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
