Revision of the derivation of stellar rates from experiment and impact on Eu s-process contributions
T. Rauscher

TL;DR
This paper introduces a new formalism for incorporating experimental data into stellar rate calculations, revealing larger uncertainties in neutron capture rates and demonstrating the impact on Eu s-process contributions in astrophysical models.
Contribution
It presents a general formalism for deriving stellar rates from experimental data, including revised uncertainties and a recommended workflow for astrophysical applications.
Findings
Uncertainties in neutron capture rates can exceed experimental errors.
The approach affects the interpretation of Eu isotope ratios in AGB star models.
A workflow for deriving stellar rates from experiments is proposed.
Abstract
A new, general formalism to include experimental data in revised stellar rates is discussed, containing revised uncertainties. Application to the s-process shows that the actual uncertainties in the neutron capture rates can be larger than would be expected from the experimental errors alone. As a specific example for how astrophysical conclusions can depend on the approach selected to derive stellar rates, the 151Eu/(151Eu+153Eu) abundance ratio from AGB star models is presented. Finally, a recommended workflow for the derivation of stellar rates from experiment is laid out.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsStellar, planetary, and galactic studies · Astro and Planetary Science · Geophysics and Gravity Measurements
