Cosmological Parameter Estimation from SN Ia data: a Model-Independent Approach
S. Benitez-Herrera (1), E.E.O. Ishida (1,2), M. Maturi (2), W., Hillebrandt (1), M. Bartelmann (3), F. R\"opke (4). ((1) Max Planck Institute, f\"ur Astrophysik, Garching bei M\"unchen, (2) IAG, Universidade de Sao, Paulo, (3) Zentrum f\"ur Astronomie, ITA

TL;DR
This paper presents a model-independent method to reconstruct the cosmic expansion rate from supernova data, finding results consistent with a flat LCDM universe and highlighting the need for approaches beyond standard parametrizations.
Contribution
It introduces a model-independent reconstruction technique for the cosmic expansion rate using supernova data, avoiding assumptions about cosmological models or gravity theories.
Findings
Reconstructed Hubble parameter aligns with flat LCDM model.
Results are closer to Planck measurements than traditional supernova analyses.
Highlights the importance of non-parametric methods in cosmology.
Abstract
We perform a model independent reconstruction of the cosmic expansion rate based on type Ia supernova data. Using the Union 2.1 data set, we show that the Hubble parameter behaviour allowed by the data without making any hypothesis about cosmological model or underlying gravity theory is consistent with a flat LCDM universe having H_0 = 70.43 +- 0.33 and Omega_m=0.297 +- 0.020, weakly dependent on the choice of initial scatter matrix. This is in closer agreement with the recently released Planck results (H_0 = 67.3 +- 1.2, Omega_m = 0.314 +- 0.020) than other standard analyses based on type Ia supernova data. We argue this might be an indication that, in order to tackle subtle deviations from the standard cosmological model present in type Ia supernova data, it is mandatory to go beyond parametrized approaches.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
