739 observed NEAs and new 2-4m survey statistics within the EURONEAR network
O. Vaduvescu, M. Birlan, A. Tudorica, M. Popescu, F. Colas, D. J., Asher, A. Sonka, O. Suciu, D. Lacatus, A. Paraschiv, T. Badescu, O. Tercu, A., Dumitriu, A. Chirila, B. Stecklum, J. Licandro, A. Nedelcu, E. Turcu, F., Vachier, L. Beauvalet, F. Taris, L. Bouquillon

TL;DR
This paper reports extensive follow-up observations of 739 NEAs and surveys of main belt asteroids, demonstrating the importance of timely astrometric follow-up and providing new statistics on NEO candidate detection rates in 2-4m class surveys.
Contribution
It presents a large dataset of NEA follow-ups and survey observations, introduces improved NEO candidate selection methods, and provides new statistical estimates for NEO detection in medium-sized surveys.
Findings
Follow-up of 739 NEAs enhances orbital data accuracy.
Survey observations discovered over 700 unknown objects, including 104 MBAs.
NEO candidate detection rates align with previous estimates, with 0.5 candidates per sq. degree in 2m surveys.
Abstract
We report follow-up observations of 477 program Near-Earth Asteroids (NEAs) using nine telescopes of the EURONEAR network having apertures between 0.3 and 4.2 m. Adding these NEAs to our previous results we now count 739 program NEAs followed-up by the EURONEAR network since 2006. The targets were selected using EURONEAR planning tools focusing on high priority objects. Analyzing the resulting orbital improvements suggests astrometric follow-up is most important days to weeks after discovery, with recovery at a new opposition also valuable. Additionally we observed 40 survey fields spanning three nights covering 11 sq. degrees near opposition, using the Wide Field Camera on the 2.5m Isaac Newton Telescope (INT), resulting in 104 discovered main belt asteroids (MBAs) and another 626 unknown one-night objects. These fields, plus program NEA fields from the INT and from the wide field…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
