Dense molecular cocoons in the massive protocluster W3 IRS5: a test case for models of massive star formation
K.-S. Wang, T. L. Bourke, M. R. Hogerheijde, F. F. S. van der Tak, A., O. Benz, S. T. Megeath, and T. L. Wilson

TL;DR
This study uses high-resolution submillimeter observations of W3 IRS5 to investigate massive star formation, providing evidence supporting the competitive accretion model over the turbulent core accretion model.
Contribution
It offers detailed observational data that help discriminate between competing models of massive star formation, favoring the competitive accretion scenario.
Findings
Massive stars are likely accreting from the global collapse of a cluster-forming core.
Observed core masses are small, but densities are high, consistent with competitive accretion.
The data suggest stars are accreting at rates around 10^-4 Msun yr^-1.
Abstract
[Context] Two competing models describe the formation of massive stars in objects like the Orion Trapezium. In the turbulent core accretion model, the resulting stellar masses are directly related to the mass distribution of the cloud condensations. In the competitive accretion model, the gravitational potential of the protocluster captures gas from the surrounding cloud for which the individual cluster members compete. [Aims] With high resolution submillimeter observations of the structure, kinematics, and chemistry of the proto-Trapezium cluster W3 IRS5, we aim to determine which mode of star formation dominates. [Methods] We present 354 GHz Submillimeter Array observations at resolutions of 1"-3" (1800-5400 AU) of W3 IRS5. ...... [Results] The observations show five emission peaks (SMM1-5). SMM1 and SMM2 contain massive embedded stars (~20 Msun); SMM3-5 are starless or contain…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
