Magnetospheric accretion on the fully-convective classical T Tauri star DN Tau
JF Donati, SG Gregory, SHP Alencar, G Hussain, J Bouvier, MM Jardine,, F Menard, C Dougados, MM Romanova, and the MaPP collaboration

TL;DR
This study uses spectropolarimetric observations to map the magnetic field and accretion processes of the fully-convective T Tauri star DN Tau, revealing a mostly poloidal, axisymmetric magnetic topology and poleward accretion, with implications for stellar spin-up.
Contribution
It provides the first detailed magnetic topology maps of DN Tau at two epochs, demonstrating non-stationary dynamo activity and the magnetic field's role in accretion and stellar spin evolution.
Findings
Magnetic topology is mostly poloidal and axisymmetric.
The large-scale magnetic field is dominated by an octupolar component.
DN Tau's magnetic field is too weak to prevent spin-up despite being fully convective.
Abstract
We report here results of spectropolarimetric observations of the classical T Tauri star DN Tau carried out (at 2 epochs) with ESPaDOnS at the Canada-France-Hawaii Telescope within the `Magnetic Protostars and Planets' programme. We infer that DN Tau, with a photospheric temperature of 3,950+-50 K, a luminosity of 0.8+-0.2 Lsun and a rotation period of 6.32 d, is a ~2Myr-old fully-convective 0.65+-0.05 Msun star with a radius of 1.9+-0.2 Dsun, viewed at an inclination of 35+-10degr. Clear circularly-polarized Zeeman signatures are detected in both photospheric and accretion-powered emission lines, probing longitudinal fields of up to 1.8 kG (in the He1 D3 accretion proxy). Rotational modulation of Zeeman signatures, detected both in photospheric and accretion lines, is different between our 2 runs, providing further evidence that fields of cTTSs are generated by non-stationary…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
