Lefschetz thimbles and stochastic quantisation: Complex actions in the complex plane
Gert Aarts (Swansea University)

TL;DR
This paper compares Lefschetz thimble and stochastic quantisation methods for complex actions in lattice field theories, analyzing their sampling distributions and the impact of residual phases in a simple model.
Contribution
It provides a comparative analysis of Lefschetz thimbles and stochastic quantisation for complex actions, highlighting their differences and the role of residual phases.
Findings
Lefschetz thimbles and stochastic quantisation produce different sampling distributions.
The residual phase on the Lefschetz thimble affects the sampling process.
Comparison conducted on a simple model to illustrate the differences.
Abstract
Lattice field theories with a complex action can be studied numerically by allowing a complexified configuration space to be explored. Here we compare the recently introduced formulation on a Lefschetz thimble with the result from stochastic quantisation (or complex Langevin dynamics) in the case of a simple model and contrast the distributions being sampled. We also study the role of the residual phase on the Lefschetz thimble.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
