The environments of luminous radio galaxies and type-2 quasars

TL;DR

This study compares the environments of radio galaxies and quasars, revealing that radio-loud galaxies are in denser regions than quiescent galaxies, and weak-line radio galaxies are more clustered than strong-line ones, indicating environment influences radio activity.

Contribution

It provides the first comprehensive comparison of environments across radio-loud and radio-quiet AGN, highlighting the environmental role in radio loudness and AGN properties.

Findings

Radio-loud galaxies are in denser environments than quiescent galaxies.

No significant environmental difference between type-2 quasars and quiescent early-type galaxies.

Weak-line radio galaxies are more clustered than strong-line radio galaxies.

Abstract

We present the results of a comparison between the environments of 1) a complete sample of 46 southern 2Jy radio galaxies at intermediate redshifts (0.05 < z < 0.7), 2) a complete sample of 20 radio-quiet type-2 quasars (0.3 < z < 0.41), and 3) a control sample of 107 quiescent early-type galaxies at 0.2 < z < 0.7 in the Extended Groth Strip (EGS). The environments have been quantified using angular clustering amplitudes (Bgq) derived from deep optical imaging data. Based on these comparisons, we discuss the role of the environment in the triggering of powerful radio-loud and radio-quiet quasars. When we compare the Bgq distributions of the type-2 quasars and quiescent early-type galaxies, we find no significant difference between them. This is consistent with the radio-quiet quasar phase being a short-lived but ubiquitous stage in the formation of all massive early-type galaxies. On the other hand, PRGs are in denser environments than the quiescent population, and this difference between distributions of Bgq is significant at the 3 sigma level. This result supports a physical origin of radio loudness, with high density gas environments favouring the transformation of AGN power into radio luminosity, or alternatively, affecting the properties of the supermassive black holes themselves. Finally, focussing on the radio-loud sources only, we find that the clustering of weak-line radio galaxies (WLRGs) is higher than the strong-line radio galaxies (SLRGs), constituting a 3 sigma result. 82% of the 2Jy WLRGs are in clusters, according to our definition (Bgq > 400) versus only 31% of the SLRGs.