Spatial Inhomogeneity of the Superconducting Gap and Order Parameter in FeSe_{0.4}Te_{0.6}
U. R. Singh, S. C. White, S. Schmaus, V. Tsurkan, A. Loidl, J., Deisenhofer, P. Wahl

TL;DR
This study uses low-temperature scanning tunneling microscopy to reveal nanometer-scale inhomogeneity in the superconducting gap of FeSe_{0.4}Te_{0.6}, showing anisotropic s-wave symmetry and inhomogeneous transition temperatures.
Contribution
It provides detailed spatially resolved analysis of the superconducting gap and identifies the anisotropic s-wave symmetry in FeSe_{0.4}Te_{0.6} with inhomogeneous transition temperatures.
Findings
Superconducting gap is spatially inhomogeneous on nanometer scale.
Best fit for gap structure is anisotropic s-wave with ~40% anisotropy.
Transition temperature varies locally and is larger than BCS predictions.
Abstract
We have performed a low temperature scanning tunneling microscopy and spectroscopy study of the iron chalcogenide superconductor FeSe_{0.4}Te_{0.6} with T_{C}~14 K. Spatially resolved measurements of the superconducting gap reveal substantial inhomogeneity on a nanometer length scale. Analysis of the structure of the gap seen in tunneling spectra by comparison with calculated spectra for different superconducting order parameters (s-wave, d-wave, and anisotropic s-wave) yields the best agreement for an order parameter with anisotropic s-wave symmetry with an anisotropy of ~40%. The temperature dependence of the superconducting gap observed in places with large and small gap size indicates that it is indeed the superconducting transition temperature which is inhomogeneous. The temperature dependence of the gap size is substantially larger than would be expected from BCS theory. An…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
